Neurological outcome and modifiable events after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients managed in a tertiary cardiac centre: A ten years register / Desenlaces neurológicos y acontecimientos modificables tras parada cardíaca extrahospitalaria en pacientes tratados en un centro de atención cardíaca terciaria: registro de 10 años

OBJECTIVE: A study was made of the events occurring in the early post-resuscitation phase that may help to improve the outcomes at hospital discharge. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study (2007-2017) of a prospective Utstein type registry database was carried using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Pre- and post-hospital admission events were investigated. SETTING: A tertiary cardiac centre. PARTICIPANTS: Unconscious victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with documented ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Events occurring before and within 72h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission were recorded. The variables were analyzed to determine their impact on hospital survival and poor neurological outcome. One-year follow-up survival was also considered. Results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). RESULTS: Of 245 patients admitted to our ICU after OHCA, 152 (62%) were alive and 131 (86.2%) presented good neurological outcomes (cerebral performance categories≤2) at hospital discharge. The one-year follow-up survival rate was 95.9%. Age >70 years (OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.1-4.1), previous myocardial infarction (OR 2.7; 95%CI 1.2-6.1), shock upon hospital admission (OR 2.9; 95%CI 1.3-6.2), time from call to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) >25min (OR 3.1; 95%CI 1.6-6.0) and anticonvulsant therapy (OR 18.2; 95%CI 5.5-60) were independent predictors of poor neurological outcome. Immediate admission to the cardiac centre (OR 0.5; 95%CI 0.3-0.9) and lactate clearance reaching plasma levels <2.5mmol/l at 12h (OR 0.4; 95%CI 0.2-0.8) were associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Unconscious OHCA patients with documented ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation may benefit from direct admission to a reference cardiac centre. Initial haemodynamic support, urgent coronary angiography and targeted management in the cardiac ICU seem to increase the likelihood of good neurological outcomes

OBJETIVO: Llevar a cabo un estudio de los acontecimientos ocurridos en la fase inmediatamente posterior a la reanimación que puedan ayudar a mejorar los desenlaces en el momento del alta hospitalaria. DISEÑO: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo (2007-2017) de cohorte de una base de datos de registro de tipo Utstein prospectivo mediante un análisis de regresión logística multivariable. Se investigaron los acontecimientos previos y posteriores al ingreso hospitalario. Ámbito: Un centro de atención cardíaca terciaria. PARTICIPANTES: Víctimas inconscientes de parada cardíaca extrahospitalaria (OHCA) con fibrilación o taquicardia ventricular documentada. VARIABLES PRINCIPALES DE INTERÉS: Se registraron los acontecimientos ocurridos antes y durante las 72h posteriores al ingreso en la unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI). Se analizaron las variables para determinar su impacto en la supervivencia hospitalaria y los malos desenlaces neurológicos. También se tuvo en consideración la supervivencia en el seguimiento a lo largo de un año. Los resultados se presentan con valores de oportunidad relativa (OR) e intervalo de confianza del 95% (IC del 95%). RESULTADOS: De los 245 pacientes ingresados en nuestra UCI tras una OHCA, 152 (62%) seguían vivos y 131 (86,2%) presentaban unos buenos desenlaces neurológicos (categorías de rendimiento cerebral≤2) en el momento del alta hospitalaria. La tasa de supervivencia en el seguimiento a lo largo de un año fue del 95,9%. La edad>70 años (OR: 2,0; IC del 95%: 1,1-4,1), los antecedentes de infarto de miocardio (OR: 2,7; IC del 95%: 1,2-6,1), el choque en el momento del ingreso hospitalario (OR: 2,9; IC del 95%: 1,3-6,2), el tiempo transcurrido entre la llamada y el regreso a la circulación espontánea (ROSC)>25min (OR: 3,1; IC del 95%: 1,6-6,0) y la administración de tratamiento anticonvulsivo (OR: 18,2; IC del 95%: 5,5-60) fueron factores predictivos independientes de un mal desenlace neurológico. El ingreso inmediato en un centro de cuidados cardíacos (OR: 0,5; IC del 95%: 0,3-0,9) y el hecho de que el aclaramiento de lactato alcanzase unos niveles plasmáticos<2,5mmol/l al cabo de 12h (OR: 0,4; IC del 95%: 0,2-0,8) se asociaron con unos mejores desenlaces. CONCLUSIONES: Los pacientes inconscientes tras OHCA y con fibrilación o taquicardia ventricular documentada podrían beneficiarse del ingreso directo en un centro cardíaco de referencia. El apoyo hemodinámico inicial, la angiografía coronaria urgente y el tratamiento dirigido en la UCI cardíaca parecen aumentar la probabilidad de obtener unos buenos desenlaces neurológicos

Neurological outcome and modifiable events after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in patients managed in a tertiary cardiac centre: A ten years register.

OBJECTIVE: A study was made of the events occurring in the early post-resuscitation phase that may help to improve the outcomes at hospital discharge. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study (2007-2017) of a prospective Utstein type registry database was carried using multivariate logistic regression analysis. Pre- and post-hospital admission events were investigated. SETTING: A tertiary cardiac centre. PARTICIPANTS: Unconscious victims of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with documented ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation. MAIN VARIABLES OF INTEREST: Events occurring before and within 72h after intensive care unit (ICU) admission were recorded. The variables were analyzed to determine their impact on hospital survival and poor neurological outcome. One-year follow-up survival was also considered. Results are presented as odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). RESULTS: Of 245 patients admitted to our ICU after OHCA, 152 (62%) were alive and 131 (86.2%) presented good neurological outcomes (cerebral performance categories≤2) at hospital discharge. The one-year follow-up survival rate was 95.9%. Age >70 years (OR 2.0; 95%CI 1.1-4.1), previous myocardial infarction (OR 2.7; 95%CI 1.2-6.1), shock upon hospital admission (OR 2.9; 95%CI 1.3-6.2), time from call to return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) >25min (OR 3.1; 95%CI 1.6-6.0) and anticonvulsant therapy (OR 18.2; 95%CI 5.5-60) were independent predictors of poor neurological outcome. Immediate admission to the cardiac centre (OR 0.5; 95%CI 0.3-0.9) and lactate clearance reaching plasma levels <2.5mmol/l at 12h (OR 0.4; 95%CI 0.2-0.8) were associated with better outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Unconscious OHCA patients with documented ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation may benefit from direct admission to a reference cardiac centre. Initial haemodynamic support, urgent coronary angiography and targeted management in the cardiac ICU seem to increase the likelihood of good neurological outcomes.

Liberal transfusion strategy improves survival in perioperative but not in critically ill patients. A meta-analysis of randomised trials.

BACKGROUND: Guidelines support the use of a restrictive strategy in blood transfusion management in a variety of clinical settings. However, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) performed in the perioperative setting suggest a beneficial effect on survival of a liberal strategy. We aimed to assess the effect of liberal and restrictive blood transfusion strategies on mortality in perioperative and critically ill adult patients through a meta-analysis of RCTs. METHODS: We searched PubMed/Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Transfusion Evidence Library, and Google Scholar up to 27 March 2015, for RCTs performed in perioperative or critically ill adult patients, receiving a restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy, and reporting all-cause mortality. We used a fixed or random-effects model to calculate the odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for pooled data. We assessed heterogeneity using Cochrane's Q and I(2) tests. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality within 90-day follow-up. RESULTS: Patients in the perioperative period receiving a liberal transfusion strategy had lower all-cause mortality when compared with patients allocated to receive a restrictive transfusion strategy (OR 0.81; 95% CI 0.66‒1.00; P=0.05; I(2)=25%; Number needed to treat=97) with 7552 patients randomized in 17 trials. There was no difference in mortality among critically ill patients receiving a liberal transfusion strategy when compared with the restrictive transfusion strategy (OR 1.10; 95% CI 0.99‒1.23; P=0.07; I(2)=34%) with 3469 patients randomized in 10 trials. CONCLUSION: According to randomized published evidence, perioperative adult patients have an improved survival when receiving a liberal blood transfusion strategy.